Paul Elisha – To follow truth wherever it may lead
Living a long life, while retaining one’s faculties, is both a blessing and a curse. The curse is to see and hear history of the most disturbing kind unnecessarily repeated. The blessing is still being able to rebut and rebuff the misstatements of deceivers and zealous would-be despots, in time to deter them.
Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are not the first to turn a misdirected political campaign into a contorted crusade, draping lies and convoluted history on a counterfeit Cross. Of the three, Santorum is the most dangerous, twisting historic truth, to suit his own political ends. This commentator can still recall the vitriolic Father Charles Coughlin and a Silver-shirted William Dudley Perry, both spewing baseless vituperative venom about those of other faiths, to incite partisan proselytes. Fortunately, they were countered and silenced by courageous officials, armed with facts and fortitude.
The stark and simple truth is that this nation’s founders intended and designed a secular government, from the outset, having witnessed the danger posed by couplings with devout despotism. James Madison warned against zealous contention over religious differences, by ambitious leaders, “… more disposed to oppress each other than to cooperate for the common good.” Benjamin Franklin observed that “… Any religion dependant on government to maintain its supremacy, is an evil religion.” Thomas Jefferson said he’d “…sworn eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” “We are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead,” he said, “so long as reason is free to combat it.” Though Jefferson and John Adams differed on much, they agreed on this. “The fundamental article of my political creed,” Adams wrote, “is that despotism or unlimited sovereignty is the same in a popular assembly, an oligarchical junto, and a single emperor.”
Santorum, Gingrich and Romney need to be reminded that for all these reasons, this nation’s founders sought to place an unbreachable wall between Church and State, at the very outset of our National Constitution, which guaranteed freedom of religious belief and practice for all — equally. That meant no precept or prerogative for any single faith.
Of all the current presidential contenders, Rick Santorum, especially, is most lacking in both historic and Constitutional grounding; else he’d be aware that his religious beliefs on procreation cannot be imposed on any citizen of his own or a differing faith. As to a Catholic as President… here, too, his historic dearth is glaring or he’d be aware, that J.F.K. was the first such candidate and President, to reassure American voters his religious beliefs would neither take nor set precedence over his Constitutional obligations. J.F.K. was true to his word. An example of which not just Rick Santorum but other Americans, of varying beliefs, leave too many of their fellow citizens woefully unconvinced.



Morning Edition
The Roundtable
Midday Magazine
Vox Pop
Media Project
51%







I always appreciate the excellent commentaries of Paul Elisha. His most recent one on the separation of church and state exposes one of our most misunderstood issues.
It can’t be stated often enough that the First Amendment is our country’s greatest boon to religion. It is the main reason religion has flourished in America in all its various and sometimes outrageous forms.
However, the wisdom shown in this part of our Constitution is lost on so many religious folk. It requires constant vigilance by a few cool-headed wise men such as Paul Elisha to keep zealots from dashing the First Amendment to pieces
The never ending argument over school prayer is a great example of how ignorance of the First Amendment distorts the thinking of many.
The question is not whether we have taken prayer out of school. Of course, we have not. Our children may pray anytime they want to in school and they may pray whatever they wish.
The question is whether we want our schools – our government – to take control of our children’s religion during school hours — dictating when and what our children should pray.
Many who claim to want government off our backs, vigorously fight in favor of government- dictated school prayer. This, of course, puts the full weight of the government on the backs of our children, suppressing what many consider to be one of our most personal and important freedoms.
Sadly, many just can’t recognize a real freedom when they see one.